Council for Responsible Nutrition
Home
| Who is CRN? | About Dietary Supplements | Industry Regulation | Press Room | Annual Conference | Members Only

Legislation

DSHEA Summary and Analysis
Before and After DSHEA
Regulation
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Self-Regulation
Regulations at a Glance
CRN Comments
Federal Register Watch
International Policy
CRN International (CRN-I) Comments
TransAtlantic Business Dialogue (TABD)
CODEX

 

Legislative Issues/Positions

Position Statement: Supplements Important Component in Prevention of Chronic Disease, Maintaining Wellness and Reducing Healthcare Costs (PDF)
Fact Sheet: Anabolic Steroids Are Not Dietary Supplements (PDF)
Position Statement: Full Enforcement of GMPs, NOT Country of Origin Labeling, Is Strongest Way to Ensure Safety and Quality of Imported Dietary Supplement Ingredients (PDF)
Position Statement: Reagan-Udall Foundation of FDA Revitalization Act (FDARA–S.1082): Does Not Negatively Impact Dietary Supplements or Conflict with DSHEA (PDF)

Press Release: CRN Welcomes GMP Final Rule

Position Statement: Dietary Supplement Good Manufacturing Practices Long Overdue; Mainstream Industry Ready, Willing and Waiting for GMPs (PDF)

Position Statement: DHEA Does Not Belong on a "Controlled Substances" List (PDF)
Position Statement: Food Stamp Program Should be Expanded to Include Nutritional Supplements Providing Vitamins and Minerals (PDF)
Position Statement: Tax Policy Should Encourage Consumers to Make Beneficial Healthcare Choices Using Dietary Supplements

Press Release: CRN Celebrates Passage of AER Bill; Commends Congress on This Important Milestone for Industry, Consumers

Position Statement: Industry Should be Required to Report Serious Adverse Events (AEs) to FDA (PDF)

Click here for CRN's informational ad on AERs

NOTE: Legislation requiring the reporting of all serious adverse events was passed on Dec. 20, 2006 and will go into effect a year from that date. Click here for details on CRN/CHPA seminar on AERs, coming June 20, 2007.

CRN Fact Sheets

DSHEA Summary & Analysis

Regulatory
Q & A

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994

Congressional Findings
Questions & Answers

DSHEA Summary & Analysis

When it enacted the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, Congress recognized the role supplements can play in health promotion and in the prevention of chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis. This comprehensive piece of legislation established a new regulatory framework for supplements, ensuring continued access to safe products, made to quality standards. It also allowed for increased dissemination of information about the health benefits of these products.

In signing the Act in 1994, President Clinton stated that "After several years of intense efforts, manufacturers, experts in nutrition, and legislators-- acting in a conscientious alliance with consumers at the grassroots level-- have moved successfully to bring common sense to the treatment of dietary supplements under regulation and law." The White House press release concluded by saying "in an era of greater consciousness among people about the impact of what they eat on how they live and how long they live, it is appropriate that we have finally reformed the way Government treats consumers and supplements in a way that encourages good health."

The legislation defined dietary supplements, created a mechanism for dealing with safety issues, regulated health claims and labeling of dietary supplements, provided for good manufacturing practices, and established new government entities to review regulations and encourage research on dietary supplements. The provisions which will aid the millions who rely on dietary supplements to improve their health are:

Definition - A dietary supplement is any product which contains one or more dietary ingredients such as vitamins, minerals, herbs or other botanicals, amino acids or other ingredients used to supplement the diet. Dietary supplement ingredients may not be regulated as food additives.

Safety- The legislation maintains FDA's authority to safeguard the public against any unsafe product. A dietary supplement can be removed from the market if FDA shows that it presents "a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury" or that it contains "a poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health." FDA can act immediately against any product that presents an "imminent hazard to public health or safety."

New Products - Before marketing a new dietary ingredient, a manufacturer must supply FDA with adequate information to provide "reasonable assurance that the ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury." This information must be supplied at least 75 days before marketing. A "new dietary ingredient" is one that is first marketed after October 15, 1994.

Claims - Truthful and nonmisleading claims that describe the role of a nutrient in supporting wellness will still be allowed on dietary supplement labels. (Examples: calcium builds strong bones; antioxidants protect against cell damage.) These claims are referred to as structure/function claims or nutritional support claims. Manufacturers must: a) have substantiation for these claims and b) notify FDA of the claim being made within 30 days of first marketing the supplement. In some cases, the label may have to include the following disclaimer: "This statement has not been evaluated by FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." A product making this kind of claim may not be classified as a drug solely because of the claim.

The legislation did not change the procedure for FDA approval of health claims, as established by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. (Example: calcium may reduce the risk of osteoporosis.) Health claims state the relationship between a nutrient and a "health-related condition." Such claims must be supported by "significant scientific agreement" and must be pre-authorized by FDA.

Publications, including articles in scientific journals, can be distributed by dietary supplement sellers as long as they are not false or misleading, do not promote a specific brand, present a balanced view of the scientific evidence, and are displayed separately from dietary supplements. If FDA asserts the material is false or misleading, the agency must prove it in court.

Labeling - A dietary supplement label must list the name and quantity of each active ingredient; identify the product as a dietary supplement; and for herbal supplements, identify the part of the plant from which it is taken. Nutrition labeling must be presented in a format appropriate to the product. If a dietary supplement claims to conform to an official standard (such as USP), it must do so.

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP's) - Supplements must be in compliance with current good manufacturing practices. FDA is authorized to issue special regulations on GMP's for dietary supplements, modeled after food GMP's. These regulations may require expiration dating on the label.

New Government Entities - The Dietary Supplement Act established two new government bodies:

Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels - A Commission was created to conduct a study on dietary supplement label claims and "evaluate how best to provide truthful, scientifically valid, and not misleading information to consumers so that such consumers may make informed and appropriate health care choices for themselves and their families." After the Commission submits a final report, FDA must implement any necessary regulatory changes, through formal rulemaking, within two years.

The Commission's seven members were appointed by the President in October of 1995. The legislation requires that the Commission's report be completed by the end of October 1996. The Commission is composed of three nutritionists, two experts on herbs, an attorney, and a specialist in government relations and public affairs. They are: Dr. Malden Nesheim of Cornell University, Chairman; Dr. Shiriki Kumanyika of the University of Illinois; Dr. Annette Dickinson of the Council for Responsible Nutrition; Dr. Norman Farnsworth of the University of Illinois; Robert McCaleb of the Herb Research Foundation in Boulder, CO; Margaret Gilhooly of Seton Hall University School of Law in Newark; and Anthony Podesta of Podesta Associates in Washington, DC. The Executive Director of the Commission is Dr. Kenneth Fisher, formerly of LSRO/FASEB (Life Sciences Research Office of the Federation of American Societies of Experimental Biology).

Office of Dietary Supplements - An office was established within the National Institutes of Health to coordinate research on dietary supplements and disease prevention, develop a database of supplement research, and advise the Secretary of Health and Human Services on supplement regulation, safety, and health claims. NIH has changed the name to "Office of Dietary Supplements Research," signaling a focus on the research-oriented aspects of the mandate. Dr. Bernadette Marriott, formerly a project director with the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences, is the Executive Director.


Congressional Findings >back to DSHEA Summary & Analysis

In passing this landmark legislation, Congress set forth a number of "findings" which emphasize the importance of communicating the positive benefits of supplements to the American public. Congress found that:

The importance of nutrition and the benefits of dietary supplements in health promotion and disease prevention have been documented increasingly in scientific studies;

There is a link between ingestion of certain nutrients or dietary supplements and the prevention of chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis;

Preventive health measures, including education, good nutrition, and appropriate use of safe nutritional supplements will limit the incidence of chronic diseases and reduce long-term health care expenditures;

Consumers should be empowered to make choices about preventive health care programs based on data from scientific studies of health benefits related to particular dietary supplements;

There is a growing need for emphasis on the dissemination of information linking nutrition and long-term good health;

National surveys have revealed that almost 50 percent of the 260,000,000 Americans regularly consume dietary supplements of vitamins, minerals or herbs as a means of improving their nutrition;

Legislative action that protects the right of access of consumers to safe dietary supplements is necessary in order to promote wellness;

Dietary supplements are safe within a broad range of intake, and safety problems with supplements are relatively rare;

Although the Federal Government should take swift action against products that are unsafe or adulterated, the Federal Government should not impose unreasonable regulatory barriers limiting or slowing the flow of safe products and accurate information to consumers;

A rational Federal framework must be established to supersede the current ad hoc, patchwork regulatory policy on dietary supplements.

Questions and Answers >back to DSHEA Summary & Analysis

The passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 creates a new regulatory framework for dietary supplements. How does the new system differ from the way supplements were previously regulated? This document is designed to answer some of the most frequently asked questions:

    Q. Why did this piece of legislation generate such strong Congressional support?

    A. Congress saw the need to recognize the value of supplements and the contribution they can make to health promotion. Congress wanted a new system that would guarantee consumer access to safe products and provide consumers with more information about the benefits of supplements. It was the pleas from millions of health conscious Americans that prompted Congress to take this much needed action.

    Q. Why was there a need to define dietary supplements in the legislation?

    A. In the past, FDA has repeatedly attempted to define dietary supplements as drugs or food additives and subsequently remove them from the market. The legislation defines a dietary supplement as any product which contains one or more dietary ingredients such as a vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanical, amino acid or other ingredient used to supplement the diet. The legislation makes it clear that these products may not be regulated as food additives or drugs under most circumstances.

    Q. Under this Act, does FDA have full authority to ensure the safety of dietary supplements?

    A. Yes, this legislation maintains FDA's authority to remove any unsafe product, but requires that the agency do it in a reasonable, methodical fashion. If a new dietary supplement ingredient is introduced, the manufacturer must have evidence of safety and must supply this evidence to FDA 75 days before marketing the product.

    Q. Does this legislation assure "truth in labeling" and make manufacturers accountable for their statements about product benefits?

    A. The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act enacted in 1938 has always required all label statements to be truthful. However, the new legislation clarifies the conditions under which a manufacturer can make a label statement about the health benefits of a product.

    Q. Can manufacturers and retailers distribute information about the benefits of supplements to consumers?

    A. Yes, as long as materials are truthful and do not promote a specific company or brand of supplement. The materials must present a balanced point of view and be displayed separately from the supplements sold in the store.

    Q. Do supplements have to comply with the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act health claim requirements?

    A. Yes. When the NLEA passed in 1990, health claims were allowed for the first time on food and supplement labels, but the law required that claims relating a nutrient to a disease condition be supported by "significant scientific agreement" and to be pre-authorized by FDA. An example of such a claim is "calcium reduces the risk of osteoporosis." These requirements still apply to supplements. However, a presidentially-appointed Commission on Dietary Supplements is reviewing health claim requirements for supplements. The legislation permits a new category of claims called "nutrition support" claims, which do not require FDA pre-authorization. These claims may describe the effect of a dietary supplement on the structure or function of the body, the biological mechanism by which a product acts, and effects on well-being.

    Q. Does the Act create any new quality standards for manufacturers to meet?

    A. Yes. If a label claims to meet quality standards such as USP, it must do so. Also, FDA is authorized to establish good manufacturing practices for supplements.

    Q. Doesn't the Office of Dietary Supplements duplicate FDA activities?

    A. No. There is a need for an Office of Dietary Supplements within the National Institutes of Health because most existing government agencies fail to appreciate the value of supplements and do not incorporate them into public health programs. This office can provide the necessary support for supplements by consolidating supplement research and advising the government on issues related to dietary supplements.

    Q. When will consumers start to see changes in supplement labels resulting from this legislation?

    A. Some manufacturers are starting to implement label changes now. However the law gives manufacturers until December of 1996 to make the required changes. This deadline may be extended, since new FDA labeling regulations have not yet been finalized.

    Q. Which congressional leaders were instrumental in passing this legislation?

    A. The initial sponsors of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 were Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Congressman Bill Richardson (D-NM). At the time of final passage, the legislation had been cosponsored by 65 Senators and 261 members of the House of Representatives -- almost two-thirds of the Senate and more than half of the House.

 

 


1828 L Street, NW, Suite 510 • Washington, DC, 20036-5114 • (202) 204-7700 fax (202) 204-7701 • e-mail webmaster@crnusa.org